Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article spinning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  21:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Article spinning

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails GNG. The 1 reference isn't even about it. CerealKillerYum (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. While the article needs inline refs, I found it defined in at least two print sources, which suggests it passes GNG:, . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or Draftify This is definitely a real thing, because I've seen it in practice, but I don't know anything about it other than that it exists. Let's not shut down the page just because it's poorly sourced right now. Maybe someone with SEO experience can cite some papers or guides that explain this process in action? 157.235.66.80 (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.