Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artifacts and gadgets from Warehouse 13


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Will userfy on request. causa sui (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Artifacts and gadgets from Warehouse 13

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A long list of what basically are trivia, a huge collection of not-independently verified minutiae and imagined objects from a TV show. I don't want to use the c-word in public, but this is pretty crufty. Drmies (talk) 02:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. This page provides relevant information for Warehouse 13. Since most of the individual episode pages have been removed, this list is extremely important because it gives reference materials for the objects on the show.


 * Keep. This Page is one of the main pages for Warehouse 13. The show is based on the items on this list. The objects are from the episodes, so I don't quite know what would be required to verify them. Many of the objects aren't made up, and even if there are ones that are fictional, it's a science fiction TV show. Put a disclaimer at the top of the page warning that the following isn't true, or find pages to cite. But don't delete the entire thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.71.127.65 (talk) 03:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete As it stands, it's primarily fancruft and duplicated, in large part, in the individual episode summaries where each artifact is mentioned. It would be an excellent article for a wikia of the show but it's not appropriate here.  Millahnna (talk) 03:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Copy. I would like to copy this to my userpage until full citations can be found 129.63.69.91 (talk) 05:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll be glad to do so if the consensus is delete--but you'll need to register an account, since I'm not sure that IP user space can have subsections. Also, I don't think verification necessarily would make this a keeper, but that's just my opinion. Drmies (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I do have an account but sometimes I'm just plain lazy . . . The DarkArcher was here (talk) 20:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Diffuse. Move the artifacts for each episode where they belong - to the episode page for each season. The artifacts for each episode belong in the infobox for that episode. We should make a new template specifically for this, and keep this page for the episode-less artifacts found at the bottom. 129.63.69.91 (talk) 05:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Each episode doesn't need its own article (and therefore doesn't need its own infobox) but I agree that the information on the artifacts is better placed in the episode summaries. Millahnna (talk) 05:34, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Move to the episode page, but clarify that the show and artifact is fictional. Historical events and people are referenced in the show, prompting further research into history, and that is always a good thing.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails the general notability guideline. Need independent reliable sources to establish notability of these gadgets. Nothing out there has the level of coverage necessary to support a proper article. Dzlife (talk) 17:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Alternatively, purge unreferenced items from the list. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Diffuse the to the various listings on the episode listing as a consistent sub-section thereof. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Any artifacts of real-world significance can be covered on episode or series page. If the concept of these artifacts as a whole has been subject of significant coverage, this can be integrated into series article or spun into a non-listy actual article. --EEMIV (talk) 01:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.