Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial Music Machine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --ST47 Talk&middot;Desk 20:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Artificial Music Machine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable, not much assertion of notability, does not meet WP:CORP. Proposed deletion a while ago was part of a disruption and reverted.. Delete. Han-Kwang (t) 11:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. It has no notable bands signed (based on the lack of articles for them) Computerjoe 's talk 21:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This entry meets the WikiProject Music criteria for importance, because one of the musicians on this label (Merzbow) meets the criteria for notability. 76.99.4.15 (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you give a pointer to the applicable policy? All I can find is WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Notability which points to Notability (music) which does not mention notability of a label by association. Han-Kwang (t) 19:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm... Aren't all record labels on Wikipedia notable 'by association' of the notable artists involved?  76.99.4.15 (talk) 17:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No, at least not exclusively. The record label, like any company, should be subject of independent publications as described in WP:CORP. Otherwise, we would have to add articles about the secretary, the lover, the sound engineer as well for every famous person or musician. Han-Kwang (t) 23:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 09:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete They get passing mentions on Google, but not articles about the label itself. MarkBul 17:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.