Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial Visualization


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Artificial Visualization

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I do not have any opinion on whether this article should be deleted. It had been prodded and I felt from the artist's apparent notability that a full deletion discussion was appropriate. I'm therefore neither for or against deletion of the article. The original prod was by, and the reason given was Not enough info to satisfy MUSIC criteria Cynical (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep- Assuming we're talking about the album, that is. The band itself does seem to at least have some notability, as the LA Times article would seem to indicate. The album then, it would follow (at least in my mind), would also be notable. I would love to see some sourcing on this though. I noticed other albums by this group have allmusic.com reviews on their pages, so that might be a place to start. Umbralcorax (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: article fails to establish notability. JamesBurns (talk) 01:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: Trivial and no independent references - no references at all. A list of tracks is like a list of chapters in a book. Take the list out, and there is one sentence giving no more information than the mention in the Infected Mushroom article. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. WP:MUSIC says "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia" (emphasis mine). I see nothing that indicates this specific album is notable.  A google search for sources is turning up nothing.  Simply because the artist is notable does not mean that this album is automatically notable.  I do note, however, that the current poor state of the article is not a reason to delete, as it is a perfectly reasonable stub article in its current state.  JulesH (talk) 10:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, informations not found, no reviews, no news, nothing! Canniba  loki  01:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.