Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial artificial intelligence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge, already performed. Mango juice talk 13:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Artificial artificial intelligence
Neologism, unintuitive term, not notable. --Amit 05:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - surprisingly this one is covered in the Economist: (subscription only). 26500 ghits. MER-C 06:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Besides Amazon.com and the press, has anyone else used the term to refer to something? --Amit 07:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Have a look at the ghits. MER-C 07:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It is the responsibility of those who want the article to stay — to establish notability of the term, failing which the article may be deleted. GHits by itself is irrelevant. --Amit 08:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Counting Google hits is not research; and encyclopaedia articles are about subjects, not terms. Pointing to a Google search is not citing a source.  Pointing to a book or an article that explains what artificial artificial intelligence is, and that discusses it, is citing a source. Uncle G 10:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Jeff Bezos or Amazon Mechanical Turk. Not notable enough (yet?) to merit its own article. &mdash; QuantumEleven 10:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Eleven. Pavel Vozenilek 22:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Give sources and Merge per Eleven --Ageo020 (talk • contribs • count ) 23:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Merged relevant content into Jeff Bezos. Redirected article to Jeff Bezos. --Amit 22:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete this term cannot be verified as a result of appropriate science research. "Certain computational tasks, such as indentifying whether a person in a photograph is male or female, are carried out much faster by humans than computers." is very disputable due to hard progress in the neural networks and pattern recognition, and stands on "one man said" statement. Tulkolahten 22:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.