Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial intelligence in chemistry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With the caveat that a rewritten version (such as one employing the sources proffered by Mark viking) is not disallowed unless it's similarly opinionated. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Artificial intelligence in chemistry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NOTADVICE and WP:NOTESSAY. Appears to be synthesis.  Dr Strauss   talk   20:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * delete the topic looks as as if it might be notable, however there is no content here that is worth keeping. It reads too much like an essay or review. If it is totally rewritten then reconsider. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. inadequately sourced editorializing. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete The topic is undoubtedly notable with books on the subject like . But the current article is full of synthesis and looks like a WP:COATRACK for the Wiley ChemPlanner product. Unless there is a total rewrite to become an encyclopedia article based on reliable sources, best to delete this. --Mark viking (talk) 23:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - disguised product promotion Agricolae (talk) 00:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems like an essay. While artificial intelligence definitely has many applications, do we really require individual articles for each topic?--DreamLinker (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.