Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial womb

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 18:39, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

Artificial womb
Substub. Poorly written. Alex.tan 15:39, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Just about enough information to be useful. Kappa 16:07, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) On second thoughts, it's not useful, but a valid topic. Looks like some people are actually working on these things Kappa 16:17, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. I did a quick rewrite, and turned the article into (hopefully) a useful stub. --Plek 20:54, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup and expand. @ Megan1967 22:41, 22 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment some good work by Plek. I've fleshed out the article more with a mention of use of uterine tanks. Megan1967 05:06, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well done Plek and Megan. Capitalistroadster 10:34, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, fine article. - TB 13:25, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.