Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artikal Music UK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RileyBugz (talk • contribs) 03:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Artikal Music UK

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One source, no claim to significance. RileyBugzYell at me &#124; Edits 00:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, oh god. The discussion threads here are still extremely confusing to navigate. Anyway, I'm definitely planing on expanding the article on Artikal Music as much as possible. This label is very important in the dubstep scene at the moment and the sole source mentioned reflects that.

I'd love to know what kind of aditional sources besides their official website and official release list you guys think is required for a music label. I can find interviews and music stores profiles but those wouldn't be a proof of a statement or anything, just another way of validating the label exists. But yeah, this and other labels I plan to add are very important to the dubstep and bass community and we feel it's time they get the recognition they deserve plus, I want to do it the right way so the articles don't get deleted. Thanks! Ecwpa (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello again, added some sources, hope it's enough to keep the article up. Ecwpa (talk) 01:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.