Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artist Zingaro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Artist Zingaro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have no access to the two quoted sources but it looks most unlikely that they are either robust or independent. It is difficult to believe that a modern American artist has no evidence of notability on-line. Nothing in the text suggests notability. Unlikely to pass WP:GNG on the evidence given.  Velella  Velella Talk 19:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Here's a news search Zingaro + enamel    and a google search  that shows gallery representation.  .  I suspect that this one just needs sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Singh  (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   Singh  (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

— Rubberbandlady (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Zingaro is a key agent in the historical perpetuation of the vitreous enamel medium (see 'Vitreous Enamel" and 'Fred Uhl Ball.') He is a rare master of the artistic medium and has trained several others who are soon to be worthy of Wikipedia recognition.   — Preceding Rubberbandlady (talk) 00:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)rubberbandlady]] comment added by Rubberbandlady (talk • contribs) 03:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - doesn't appear to be notable. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Citobun (talk) 15:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 11:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the sources are primary. I fail to see significant third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 15:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet typical criteria and only a handful of news hits, with barely a mention. Not notable. Aeonx (talk) 17:14, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.