Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artist trading cards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as it has had major clean-up since nomination and no one else wanted deletion. Tavix (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Artist trading cards

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N as it hasn't been covered extensively in any secondary, reliable sources. Tavix (talk) 21:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   —Beeblebrox (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * neutral for now It's a real phenomenon, with an entire book on the subject, but doesn't seem very well known outside of the persons who do it. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I'm gonna go with Keep. I've found lots of mentions in newspapers of workshops being held all over the place: are just a few examples. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep A google books search reveals several books on the subject. The article needs a lot of work though.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That it does. I was surprised such a crummy article had such a long history. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per book cited above. Hobit (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Hogvillian (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.