Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artistic Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. This AfD was never properly opened, and ere was never properly closed, yet the article was deleted nonetheless. Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. (non-admin closure) jp×g 21:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Artistic Solutions

 * – (View AfD


 * Delete. Cannot see the link of what is being said, and I cannot make sense of the first lines. Max Browser (talk) 20:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. So if the user above cannot "make sense" of the article, is it my problem??? Hardly a reason to invent deletion article. International Pumpkin (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * — Note to closing admin: International Pumpkin (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
 * — Note to closing admin: International Pumpkin is now blocked as a vandalism-only account.


 * Didn't answer my point about it being disjointed. Max Browser (talk) 20:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Make up your mind, you editing as Meters or Max Pumpkin? International Pumpkin (talk) 20:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete vandalism. The vast majority of this article is just material copied from existing articles and has nothing to do with the apparent subject, Artistic Solutions. The lede paragraph is the only material relating to the subject, and it is incomprehensible gibberish. Meters (talk) 20:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Gibberish. You said more or less the same thing when you logged in as Max Browser. International Pumpkin (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete vandalism. Editor is obviously only here to be disruptive. noq (talk) 20:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.