Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artists' Bluebook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Artists' Bluebook

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Looks like a dead-end page only with irrelevant external links. A possible candidate for deletion? Abani79 (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Arts. Netherzone (talk) 07:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete AskART might be notable and worth creating, but there's no evidence this book would meet any standards. I can find only limited information, mostly comprising mirrors and library listings, but none indicating it's well collected or cited. Star   Mississippi  15:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:PROMO This is an unsourced article for a subscription service. Surprised it has survived this long. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.