Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arts Talk with the Johnson Brothers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:35, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Arts Talk with the Johnson Brothers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable online radio program lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Although host is notable, notability is not inherited. Fails WP:GNG.  ttonyb (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Not sure the host is notable either, all the links in his article seem to be primary sources.--Yaksar (let's chat) 06:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No actual substantive third-party coverage, fails WP:GNG. Also appears to be part of a WP:COATRACK including the autobiography article on the host. (Almost an A7, but claiming to have interviewed Cousin Oliver might be a claim of importance.) -- Kinu t /c  19:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I created this page and do not have a problem with you deleting it. I was not aware of WP:COATRACK until you brought it up in this link but that was not the intention of submitting it.  I do agree regarding notability as this program does not specialize in interviewing just 'known' actors.  This program was started to allow for focus on visual artists, stage actors, and professional educators in those fields as well as some known actors, yes we interviewed Cousin Oliver (Robbie Rist) and even actor Keith Coogan with more lined up.  So at some point I would hope it has the notability required but agree right now it is lacking.  User: Duaneivan  —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 12 April 2011 (UTC).


 * Speedy Delete The creator and really only editor who has added content to the article has agreed it is not notable and should be deleted. Given the editors comments, however, I'd suspect they would want it userfied so they could continue to work on it.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:03, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Yaksar, yes I would like to have it userfied so I can continue to work on it. How do we make that a happen? User: Duaneivan  —Preceding undated comment added 23:12, 13 April 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.