Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arundu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) Winner 42 Talk to me!  16:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Arundu
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Arundu is no place correct on is Arandu Saqraat (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 22.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters. —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed header. Close/speedy keep as not for deletion, AfD is not cleanup etc., etc. as with the previous two.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 15:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * PS. Note that it was the nom who cleared the original article and redirect it to Arandu a very short while back on this same day. This is getting disruptive looking bruh.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 15:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Enough information exists to prove it is not a hoax, keep per WP:NPLACE. AfD is not the place to discuss moves. Winner 42 Talk to me!  15:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Passes WP:NPLACE. Note the nominator has created Arandu about the same place, so that will need fixing. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW Keep - Nomination is in bad faith, filed by yet another sock of a particular vandal. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.