Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arunodoy Asom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 07:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Arunodoy Asom

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sources in the article and available via WP:BEFORE do not contribute to the WP:GNG or any applicable WP:SNG. Text shows significant WP:REFBOMBing. Sources that are significant are not reliable or not independent and significant coverage is lacking from nearly every source. See source assessment table for further detail. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 00:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 00:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 00:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.  Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 00:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 00:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is less than a year old and the following indicate to me reasons to presume his notability. His quotes are routinely carried in WP:RS; even in BBC last year. ToI said he's considered an "important ULFA(I) leader" by the "security forces". While this looks like a blog, Imphal Times is indeed a published newspaper. The attack referred to in the assessment table were covered by other national and local media as well. His name figuring in a citizenship list was considered news enough. Given the issues of different romanisations, my own lack of bengali/assamese knowledge and the lackluster coverage of NE India in mainstream press, I'm willing to vote keep for now based on these indicators. (More so when similar articles on South India celebs have been kept on similar sourcing; which, to be clear, is not an WP:OSE argument, it's a same-standards-for-all argument.) Hemantha (talk) 05:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If notability is adjudged insufficient, merging (or at least redirect) to ULFA should be considered. Hemantha (talk) 05:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BASIC as shown by source assessment table. Mztourist (talk) 08:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and Mztourist. In addition, this is most likely a UPE creation by a now blocked editor.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Stop spreading hatred, onel5969. Gnisu (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC) Blocked block evading sock. Only the CU's will know for sure which. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 08:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * NT4M's block is irrelevant to the notability of the subject. NT4M is blocked for WP:CIR after having a meltdown due to off-Wiki orchestrated harassment. (see struck comment above). Having said all that--
 * Delete I agree sourcing just isn't up to what is needed for notability. ( I came here chasing down the latest block evading sock in this bizarre Wikidrama. Get Harrison Ford to play me in the movie.) -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 08:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps of slight interest at a local/regional level, but hardly a topic for the English Wikipedia. The coverage and sourcing isn't there. Zaathras (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to United Liberation Front of Assam. He does not seem to have much content other than saying he is its officer.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BASIC and the fundaments of WP:BLP.  SN54129  15:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.