Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aruvikkuzhi Waterfalls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Aruvikkuzhi Waterfalls

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of notability. [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 05:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, if someone can reliably source the statement "The waterfall cascades down the mountains from a height of 102 ft." Seems to be an encyclopedic subject, and there are several similar waterfall articles on Wikipedia. Not really a policy-based argument, I'll admit. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 10:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep they are a waterfall. Geographical features are notable. Dloh cierekim  12:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep,,  shows that it is a valid geographical entry per our gazetteer function. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NGEO. Ansh666 17:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.