Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvind Narayanan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Arvind Narayanan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established Ysangkok (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wired calls him "one of the leading hands-on thinkers in exploring how traditional notions of privacy are radically fractured by the collision of big data and cheap analytics", and his major paper has 600+ cites. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. Assistant professors are usually WP:TOOSOON but I think his citation record (on Google scholar ) meets WP:PROF through multiple highly-cited works. (I am not so much interested in the h-index here, whose moderate value mostly reflects how long he has been working, but rather the seven papers with 100+ cites each.) —David Eppstein (talk) 23:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - per SarekOfVulcan and I'm partial to David Eppstein's comments also. Those sorts of accolades from an independent publication are a pretty good indication of notability.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 02:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - because of the citation record.   HalfGig   talk  02:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.