Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvind Poswal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. With all due respect, the keepers do not actually present any arguments. Drmies (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Arvind Poswal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I find that newer editors tend to remove PRODs, so I'm nominating this article for deletion. It is a poorly written article. In particular, I'm not even sure if this person is notable. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:29, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep – Being poorly written is not a criteria for deletion, it is a criteria for improvement. What's needed here is clarification about the notability claims.  The article does claim notability in the form of awards and accolades, but does not explain the significance of the awards.  If more background on those awards is not forthcoming, then I would change this to delete on the grounds of notability.  But right now it really should be Keep & improve. —&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160;Bill W.&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160; (Talk)&#160;&#160;(Contrib)&#160;&#160; (User:Wtwilson3) &#160;&#160;— 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ceradon  ( talk  •  contribs ) 06:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ceradon  ( talk  •  contribs ) 06:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ceradon  ( talk  •  contribs ) 06:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Userfy this is a new article by a first time editor. Before considering deletion it should be determined if it can meet WP standards. The lists need to be deleted, and all statements of fact need references. Unrelated personal information (who performed the wedding and the studies of his son) should be removed. After that is done, the article could be submitted to Articles for Creation for review. LaMona (talk) 00:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and Improve - The article's not perfect but we're an encyclopedia and we improve on articles everyday so can't see why we can't improve this?. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles should NOT be deleted because they are poorly written. They can always be rewritten. But hey, want to delete because he MIGHT not be notable? Doesn't make sense to me. Postcard Cathy (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  12:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. Looks like a test version is at User:Tapan1966/sandbox, where it is the same as the namespace version. There is no evidence that this passes the average professor test: the "fuse1 technique for hair transplant"(sic) seems to be the name of his practice, rather than a technique in use (http://fusehair.com/). BakerStMD T&#124;C 01:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - The Herald (here I am) 16:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.