Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvind Vinod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the article's creator or someone else wishes to retrieve the article to work on it in userspace, please leave me a note.  So Why  10:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Arvind Vinod

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to support general notability guideline and no indication of passing WP:NACTOR. GSS (talk |c|em ) 11:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 11:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 11:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article's creator is currently on a hiatus, and will expand once he returns. Besides, there are sufficient reliable sources to confirm the actor's notability. --  Kailash29792   (talk)  11:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you plaese explain what reliable sources? GSS (talk |c|em ) 12:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, you beat me to this. Only The Hindu, Rediff and Maalai Malar are what Wikipedia would call "reliable sources". Instead this could be draftified. -- Kailash29792   (talk)  12:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The sources in the article are not independent of the subject also there is no indepth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources as required by the WP:GNG and a Google news search result showing nothing helpful at all so how it passes notability? GSS (talk |c|em ) 13:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Why are you still beating a dead horse? I already said you could remove the article from the mainspace, but allow a draft article to exist in its place. Kailash29792   (talk)  13:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No I'm not, I just asked you because of your comment above there are sufficient reliable sources to confirm the actor's notability. I appreciate your suggestion but I'm surprised how an experianced editor like you can ignore standard of our general notability guideline. GSS (talk |c|em ) 13:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was my mistake to assume that just those few reliable sources were "sufficient", and I'm sorry. -- Kailash29792   (talk)  14:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I fail to see significant coverage of Vinod provided in any of the sources listed. We have a PR blurb that addresses him very briefly, and reviews of threes films he has been in. While his appearance in one (or more) notable films could be seen as weakly fulfilling criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR, the lack of direct, significant coverage of Vinod makes me lead towards delete. Winner 42 Talk to me!  01:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability fails GNG and NACTOR it is probably WP:TOOSOON .FITINDIA&#160;(talk)</b></i> 07:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.