Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryana Engineer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 13:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Aryana Engineer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Individual only has two supporting acting roles, no awards or recognitions for her work, no evidence of contributing or affecting the entertainment industry in any way, and no major fan base (Facebook and Twitter accounts or random, unofficial fan sites do not necessarily merit notability). Clearly fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR. While it is quite possible she may become more well known in the future if she continues acting, we cannot assume that under WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:RISING as it is also possible that she will suddenly quit acting because she hates it so much. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 00:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. She had major roles in two big-budget films, which satisfies NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:56, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly meets notability, due to major roles in two big-budget films.HillbillyGoat (talk) 03:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, has been part of two big-budget films with major roles, meets WP:NACTOR. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 07:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.