Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asa Bird Gardiner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Asa Bird Gardiner

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The reason is evident from the article.  U z EE   (Talk • Contribs) 01:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Umm, the reason isn't really clear to me. Would you care to dilate on the rationale for your nomination? Deor (talk) 01:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Reason: Sorry for the lame reason. My keyboard is not working o I was avoiding long descriptions. The reason I put it up was that it is an unotable biography with no encyclopedic content whatsoever.  U z EE   (Talk • Contribs) 01:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recipient of the Medal of Honor. Pburka (talk) 02:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. MoH, MoH taken away, DA of New York County, meaning a key consigliere of the Tammany crowd, and resigned and was prosecuted for malfeasance in office; also prosecuted case of Johnson Chesnut Whittaker. I don't know what your rationale actually is, UzEE, so you'll have to explain it more clearly. It's just a cut-and-paste from an historical source almost certainly out of copyright, and we'll have to check on that, but if you thought it was a copyvio you would have taken another route than AFD. --Dhartung | Talk 04:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Also, a case he argued, People v Molineux, led to an historic decision by the state Supreme Court of New York that was later the bases for the Federal Rule of Evidence. --Dhartung | Talk 04:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong keep per Dhartung RogueNinja talk  15:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Due to Medal of Honor (anyone else ever had it rescinded?) and political connections David Underdown (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   —Nick Dowling (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Medal of honour winners are automatically notable, and being stripped of the medal makes his person even more notable. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per Nick--Nobunaga24 (talk) 09:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Multiple assertions of notability in article. Edward321 (talk) 03:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.