Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asa Lanova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Noting also that the nominator has withdrawn their nomination. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Asa Lanova

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable writer and dancer. Quis separabit? 19:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable as a writer or a dancer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 02:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 02:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 02:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep: Literary award winner (just added) and scope for more expansion from the 2011-created French article (other awards), will possibly be obits as sources as she died 26 Dec 2017.  Pam  D  09:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * NOMINATION WITHDRAWN: NOW IT IS AN ENCYCLOPAEDIC ARTICLE! Quis separabit?  18:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * AfD is NOT clean-up. Another case of WP:BEFORE. Edwardx (talk) 22:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * @Edwardx -- NO : this was not a matter of cleanup. The article had virtually no information and someone had left a misleading and, frankly, false, tag. It was not under construction and should not have been created if the person who created it was NOT going to do what needed to be done to bring the article into compliance. (see ) Now that the it is, I have withdrawn the nomination. Rather superfluous given the keep votes but an action I believe is necessary in an AFD when an article has been brought into compliance.  Quis separabit?  02:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as notable author with article references satisfying WP:BASIC. Thanks to those who fixed my typos in the additional information I added yesterday. I got called away from the keyboard before I could do that or !vote here. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 18:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 19:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep with the Schiller Award addition, I think this meets BEFORE/GNG standards now. South Nashua (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep With the Schiller Award now noted. Passes WP:GNG. Lacypaperclip (talk) 04:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.