Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asa Mader


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 06:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Asa Mader

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This was speedily deleted. I felt that discussion at AFD was appropriate given the article's long history and the subject's award nomination. Michig (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. If keeped should be better presented. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Lots of coverage in Google News. For example, Monsters & Critics called him an "acclaimed director/visual artist". Cullen328 (talk) 04:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Aside from the fact that the article was created for promotional purposes, none of the sources are about the subject and most are namechecks only. Award nominations are one of those things that indicates sources might be available, but none are cited. Guy (Help!) 07:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓  03:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:CREATIVE. Article is in need of cleanup and use of available sources, and both he AND his works have received coverage. Addressable issues are rarely cause for deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep There are definitely scholarly, independent sources, covering more than just a mention of his name. Many sources--I'm looking at the ones presented by User:MichaelQSchmidt--talk about the importance and impact his style of film making has had on the industry. This article even has several sources in it already supporting his notability, though there is no doubt it needs to be cleaned up, and reviewed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Arador (talk • contribs) 05:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.