Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Naqvi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Asad Naqvi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poor index, fails WP:NPROF. He now works at Goldman Sachs. Störm  (talk)  15:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet academic notability or GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NPROF. Associate professors and lecturers almost never pass the prof test. Thousands of physics students fell into the trap of string theory in the 1990s. Bearian (talk) 00:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note The GS profile in the opening post is not for the subject. Here is a link to the subject's profile on inSPIRE. H-index of 22 is decent. Neutral on deletion. Nominator does deserve some trouting for clearly not looking at the previous AfD. TR 19:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Citations make a plausible case for WP:PROF but this is a high-citation field and I am swayed by his having left academia at a relatively junior level. The article doesn't make any case for post-academic notability and has nothing interesting to say about his earlier research accomplishments, being merely a bare listing of posts he held, so I don't see a lot of value in keeping this. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.