Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asambhava


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Asambhava

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N, WP:V and the article is mainly relying on unreliable references i.e. Wordpress. ''' C ute st Penguin (Talk) 11:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ''' C ute st Penguin  (Talk) 11:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ''' C ute st Penguin  (Talk) 12:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Kannada:


 * WP:INDAFD: Asambhava D. Rajendra Babu H V Subba Rao V. Ravichandran
 * As it appears this brand new article can be sourced away from wordpress, why not simply tag it for issues and let them be addressed over time and through regular editing?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment when there are such references as you are stated above, then why you have not sourced the article. Sorry! to say but you are truly wasting time of other editors by adding unreliable sources to your articles and later arguing for the some or other causes. Instead of adding those references here you should use these to the article. I think there are very few Wikipedian who can read Kannada and you are making fool to those who cannot. ''' C ute st Penguin  (Talk) 06:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * @ User:Cutest Penguin: I added NO sources to this article, so check your facts. WP:ADHOM arguments are rarely convincing... and while I have improved over 550 weak articles, it is just as much your "job" as mine . Read WP:COMMUNITY and WP:SEP. My comment was not about SIGCOV, but for sourcability away from wordpress. Its problematic to not allow a creator time to improve an article.  Being at the minimum at least sourcable, WP:ATD allows options that might allow that improvement, even were sources to not be in English. If unimproved, deletion is always an option, it just should not always be the first and only choice for weak articles, if issues might be addressed. Having few Kannada-reading Wikipedians does not mean we may declare Kannada topics somehow non-notable. What wastes other's time are possibly poor deletion nominations from a well-meaning new editor with 1500 edits and attacking an administrator with over 50,000. Tred carefully.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Is wordpress articles acceptable as reliable reference. ?''' C ute st Penguin (Talk) 12:01, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Generally not, as WordPress is an open source web creation tool and pretty much anyone with the knowledge can build a site using it. We then look beyond the tool to an author, and consider if they have the expertise to offer their opinion. WP:Identifying reliable sources tells us that "Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both." So for example, if Roger Ebert were so inclined (hah!) to use it to build a website and offer his views, we could consider his expertise as a reviewer, and not so much on where he chose to share his accepted-as-expert opinion.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The title of the current article is Asambhava which mean impossible in English and if we try to look for reliable references using google and the word so called Asambhava we will get a lots of results in the native language which may talk of different topic or field. ''' C ute st Penguin (Talk) 12:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Read WP:NONENG, WP:CSB, WP:INDAFD, and even WP:NCF. One of the greatest issues in sourcing non-English topics is proper translation (if possible).  If this film was never released or issued under the English name "Impossible", then there is no point in looking for it that way. That said, even "Asambhava (1986 film)" would make more sense than "Impossible (1986 film)", but far more reasonable to look for it under it original title of "ಅಸಂಭವ" and refine searches to include director, writer, producers, etc. IN the original language (ie: the Kannada language, not in English). If one grants an inability to find or judge  non-English sources for a non-English topic, one does well to not place themselves in a position to evaluate that which they are admittedly unable to evaluate. Seek experts in Kannada.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Year:
 * Director:
 * Producer:
 * Producer:
 * Writer:
 * Actor:
 * Actor:
 * Actor:


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   15:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (constabulary)  @ 20:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.