Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asami Sato


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete all. No prejudice against re-creating these articles as redirects. -Scottywong | gab _ 16:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Asami Sato

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable enough for devoted articles and only verifiable information on any of the characters is their respective voice actors, the fact they are in the show, and brief descriptions of their character traits. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 19:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm also nominating the following articles as they are pretty much in the same exact situation (all characters of the same show).


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 19:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 19:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 19:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge into a "list of Legend of Korra characters" article. Seems like a viable option, though deletion is OK too. There's an Avatar Wiki where all this info and more is available. It's kind of trivial information for Wikipedia.--74.58.194.221 (talk) 03:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The articles were made not too long ago and still need editing. Light2Shadow (talk) 04:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all. There is not enough reliably sourced material to write out-of-universe articles about all of these characters (see WP:GNG) - and I should know, having just rewritten the main article's "reception" section based on all the reasonably reliable reviews found through Google. Merging would not be appropriate because that would only concatenate the excessive plot summary and other WP:IN-U content that is better suited to fan wikis. At the current level of sourcing, covering the characters in the main article is entirely sufficient. That probably applies to Amon (The Legend of Korra) also.  Sandstein   20:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect all to The Legend of Korra Rather than nuking the pages I think we should redirect them for now as they are likely search terms, in any case the articles are not ready to be made yet as the sources are lacking I would wait for at least season 2 to end so more info can be generated about them. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirection isn't useful because with the "(The Legend of Korra)" suffix these titles are not likely search terms.  Sandstein   19:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think in some cases those redirects may still be useful. If I type "pabu" into the search bar, the software predicts the ten most likely articles that start with those characters; at the moment, number nine on the list is Pabu (The Legend of Korra). This would still appear as a predicted search result if the page were a redirect to The Legend of Korra, but it wouldn't appear if the page was deleted. I think a search for "pabu" would also show The Legend of Korra higher in the search listings if there was a redirect from Pabu (The Legend of Korra) than it would if there was no such page. I don't think that this has been written down in any guideline though. If I remember correctly, search bar prediction is quite a recent feature; it might be that we need to update the guidelines with the implications it has for redirects. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: has just been created, already with an Afd tag directing to this discussion. So for the record I hereby nominate that article for deletion too. De728631 (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I went WP:BOLD and redirected the pages prodded to The Legend of Korra. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Smart move. And the Beifong article I think was inadvertently added to this AfD. (Don't think somebody would make an article and nominate for deletion on the first revision. :P). — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 04:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Im glad that it worked well =), for reference the others that were created include: Chief Lin Beifong as well as Tenzin, and Rohan. Someone should keep an eye out for these redirects as well as new character articles that may pop up. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect all to The Legend of Korra per my comment above. (Now that I've commented, I may as well make it official.) — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.