Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asaram Bapu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consesus reached. This is non-admin closure to AfD. Wikidās ॐ 12:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Asaram Bapu

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC) *Delete Non notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily meets the notability guidelines with plenty of coverage in reliable third party sources RMHED (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Must be improved Refusetobesilenced (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Many issues, but notable.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems notable. desperately needs sourcing.Yobmod (talk) 12:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Keeping this article would allow for Asaram Bapu to have a place for his information and also might be a good place for two articles related to him that have little to no sources/notability; Swami Sri Lilashahji Maharaj and Sant Sri Asaramji Ashram. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note to admin Nominator changed vote to Keep. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.