Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asarva–Udaipur City Intercity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Asarva–Udaipur City Intercity

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails to meet WP:GNG in any way, which the article cites is just a list of train times. Sohom ( talk ) 03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Gujarat,  and Rajasthan.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. This nomination focuses on references rather than on sources, in defiance of the golden NEXIST rule. 22:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , I did search for sources, the only ones I found was which is doesn't actually mention the Intercity train at all, which is why it isn't mentioned in my nom statement. Sohom ( talk ) 23:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the additional research. Could we perhaps change to the railroad rather than a service on it? gidonb (talk) 02:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, I found no sourcing on this unnamed train routing (the "name" is literally [TERMINAL A]-[TERMINAL B] Intercity). As an aside, I don't get how in general Wikipedia decided to have articles on nearly all train routings in India, it's like trying to make an article on every generic intercity rail service in Europe (ex. trying to make an article based off this new UK service), which we don't do. Jumpytoo Talk 03:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.