Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asessippi Ski Area


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Manitoba Escarpment as the article has already been merged. (non-admin closure)  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 03:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Asessippi Ski Area

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Business does exist, but is not notable. Searching for it turns up very little (mainly reviews), it has also not received much coverage, breaching Notability. Dellwood546 (talk)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This was apparently formatted incorrectly and has received zero input and no deletion sorting efforts; relisting.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak merge into Asessippi Provincial Park. Can't find in-depth discussions of this ski area, but I feel ski areas are close to falling under WP:NGEO. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge [was "Keep"] Assertion of largest in a huge province of Canada establishes importance. wp:ITSAPUBLICATTRACTION (to which i contributred). And i agree about NGEO. And reviews and good quality tourist guide coverage is fine, reliable. —-Doncram (talk) 01:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge option, as argued by Silktork below and mostly implemented already by BritishFinance, is okay by me. This keeps the article history intact at the redirect so if further information/sources emerge, the article can be restored.  Interesting to see the merged material appears to be the entirety of the AFD-nominated article. I don't really see how this is much of an advance for human knowledge, but whatever. --Doncram (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   15:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak merge. WP:NGEO says both commercial developments and named nature natural features still require sig coverage. I don't see how this merits an article under any interpretation of NGEO. Newspaper searching finds mostly advertisements. I don't think Asessippi Provincial Park is a good merge candidate as this is a commercial venture located near but outside the public parks. Suggest merging into Inglis, Manitoba which like the park, is only nearby (although the mailing address is Inglis]] or probably better, Rural Municipality of Riding Mountain West, the administrative jurisdiction where the ski resort is located. MB 05:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete this is a business/resort, not a geographical feature, and it fails WP:NCORP pretty comprehensively. SportingFlyer  T · C  10:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - non notable resort, secondly the article is a stubby. If anyone want to expand it, put it in draft. For now, it is best to be removed - Jay (talk) 06:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Asessippi Provincial Park or Manitoba Escarpment, as below; not picky . Hyperbolick (talk) 15:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Asessippi Provincial Park; probably leaving the history for merging anything relevant. This is a very stubby article on a business of suspect notability, in the context of a notable geographical area that itself has a rather stubby article. This is likely best dealt with by a sentence in the park's article. ~ mazca  talk 18:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Manitoba Escarpment as that is where it is. I was going to close this, but found I could not as I didn't agree with the logical outcome. The arguments for merging to the nearest appropriate article are the most plausible and have consensus. And the consensus for the target of the merge is Asessippi Provincial Park; but, as the ski slope is not in that park but is in Manitoba Escarpment that would not be an appropriate close. And nobody can close as merge to Manitoba Escarpment as that has not been proposed, so it would be a supervote. I am putting down "merge to Manitoba Escarpment" as this allows another admin the option of closing that way if they reach the same conclusion as me. SilkTork (talk) 11:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Manitoba Escarpment per . Given there is little consensus to Keep this article, I have BOLDLY merged it into Manitoba Escarpment (the geographic area that it is in; it is technically not in the actual Asessippi Provincial Park); all that remains is to Redirect this article to Manitoba Escarpment. Hope that helps. Britishfinance (talk) 13:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Manitoba Escarpment Lightburst (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.