Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ash Bowie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Olaf Davis (talk) 18:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Ash Bowie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

BLP, unsourced and tagged since creation in February 2007, no showing of notability —Finell 02:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Wolfview (talk) 02:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced and notability not even asserted. Playing a guitar does not in itself make a person notable.
 * Keep plenty of independent coverage (reviews and interviews) for this guitarist:
 * City Pages
 * PopMatters
 * Duke Chronicle
 * Pitchfork
 * The Stranger (newspaper)

etc. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 01:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * Keep: Notability is indeed asserted. Passes WP:MUSIC #5&6 at least. - BalthCat (talk) 01:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep -- notable, passes WP:MUSIC -- Minor4th (talk) 04:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Coverage more than adequately demonstrates notability.--Michig (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above evidence of notability. --  role player 12:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.