Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asha Kumari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Forced_conversion. (or a different target if there is a better one) Black Kite (talk) 05:45, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Asha Kumari

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable person involved in a common occurrence in the region Darkness Shines (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC) However, this is one of three closely-related articles which may be merged at editorial discretion: Rinkle Kumari, Asha Kumari, Lata Kumari. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. References are sufficient to pass WP:GNG, and it is nonsense to suggest that being a party to a Supreme Court case is an every day occurrence.
 * Merge these three articles together; Supreme Court cases are notable, but I don't really see a need for three separate articles with more or less the same content. As well, when merging, please check the facts/sources; one article says that the plaintiffs wished to remain with their husbands, while the other says they wished to remain with their parents! –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 16 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge per Roscelese. I would expect that she's correct in asserting the notability of Supreme Court cases in Pakistan, and putting these articles together (minus the inconsistency that she notes!) would form a good basis for an article on this case.  If Asha and the others get substantial coverage in the future, we can always split them out and have standalone articles; there's precedent for this with parties to US Supreme Court cases, as seen in articles such as William Marbury and Norma McCorvey.  Nyttend (talk) 06:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Forced_conversion. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.