Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashanthi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep. No arguments to delete besides nominator. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 01:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Ashanthi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * DeleteThere is no any importance to create an article about this person. There are more than 1000 upcoming singers In Sri Lanka and encyclopedia is not a plat form to create personal blogs about them. Most of information in the article is essentially unverifiable. I am not sure of the accuracy of the article because anybody can publish personal interviews or personal coverage using newspapers or website. No sophisticate evidence of the coverage required to meet notability requirements. This is a personal promotion. --Wipeouting (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * note the AfD was incorrectly formatted, as far as I can tell, ontop of a previous nomination. I have relisted it and informed the user above who created the original S.G.(GH) ping! 19:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is an obvious case of meeting WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The nominators assertion that Most of information in the article is essentially unverifiable is demonstrably false. Nom refuses to consider newspapers as reliable sources ("sophisticate sources" in his words.--Sodabottle (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep As Sodabottle notes WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO are met. Jarkeld (talk) 19:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --Sodabottle (talk) 19:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.   --Sodabottle (talk) 19:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - original Afd was closed as keep after User:Black Kite added a bunch of good sources. Not clear why nominator here finds them unacceptable. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - There is no proper rationale for deletion. The article has lots of sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.