Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asharfi Lal Mishra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Asharfi Lal Mishra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per wp:Notability. Non-notable person, only sources, which editor is now edit warring over, are WP pages, WP:Commons pages, Twitter and Facebook. Likely autobiography. 220  of  Borg 05:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 No assertion of importance in the article. Unremarkable maths teacher.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 07:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Is document not reliable source?(Teacher1943)


 * I have found sources from Facbook,twitter & website and also met to Asharfi Lal Mishra in a annual function at Galuwapur Inter College.He is eminent educationists of State Uttar Pradesh,India.If administration is not satisfied please delete it shortly.Thanks.(Teacher1943) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teacher1943 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I have told you, more than once, that "Facbook,twitter & website" (personal website that is) are self-published and therefore not reliable sources and so cannot be used on WP as references. 220  of  Borg 10:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Dear gentlemen! I have linked documentary proof ie. A certificate given by state government of Uttar Pradesh,India for "Teacher Award 1998" but not accepted Please tell me option for it. I have linked other many photo groups & certificate but not accepted please tell me suitable & reliable option source. Teachers/educationists are not willing go to media for publicity in India. Educationists are not businessmen.Print media is also under pocket. Please tell me a certificate is reliable or a news paper,photo group is reliable or news paper. According to WP news paper is reliable.It means any degree or any award or any prize has no meaning without approval of print media. and print media is not so fair and its work.At last I have found that according to WP any achievement has no meaning. Dear sir achievements are ornaments of print media.(Teacher 1943) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teacher1943 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Please first of all you provide me reliable list of news agency,news papers ,reliable books,reliable scholars.(Teacher1943} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teacher1943 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a worthy gentleman who has provided long and dedicated service to the community, but doesn't meet the standards expected for Wikipedia biographees.  Le petit fromage (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Per A7. No indication of notability or importance. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Here is how to find out if a source is reliable or not.--Skamecrazy123 (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * There is also the question as to whether the award confers enough notability to push its recipient over the notability bar. Le petit fromage (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete not A7, because it does assert significance. But what';s here is not enough to make him notable.  DGG ( talk ) 19:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The Article is simply a non-sense and clearly does not qualify BLP at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dormantos (talk • contribs) 12:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This newly registered account has left the very similar deletion rationales (almost every one a "strong delete") on dozens of AfDs in rapid fashion. Likely he did not read any of the articles (one he said fails "BLP" was a company, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.