Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashburnham Insurance Services Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Ashburnham Insurance Services Limited

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability via search results or coverage in reliable source or news coverage. Article was previously deleted via CSD and recreated a short time later by author with little improvement. Flowanda | Talk 02:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see any notability. Clubmarx (talk) 04:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a run-of-the-mill High Street broker to me, with no evidence stated to suggest otherwise. Claims of nation wide coverage are available to anyone with a post box; large number of branches might have helped. Turnover? Nothing to suggest notability. Emeraude (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  01:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails to establish notability per WP:CORP. Notability and verifiability is established by references including reliable and independent sources which are not present. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 02:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.