Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashbury, Heritage Conservation Suburb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ashbury, New South Wales. The "keep"s make no sense. Any useful material can be merged from history.  Sandstein  21:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Ashbury, Heritage Conservation Suburb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not really sure what the context is, but it seems to be an unreferenced article about the architecture of Ashbury, New South Wales. Would say to merge but it fails WP:V. Kb.au (talk) 01:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Tony Rodi (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC) Citations and references added.
 * Merge, if it can be adequately sourced I gather an Australian Heritage Conservation Area is similar in concept to a US National Register of Historic Places historic distract, which (when sourced) is considered inherently notable. I find minimal sourcing available on a quick search ( and a few trivial mentions), but presumably documentation exists for registry in a national program. If it can be sourced, it should be merged to Ashbury, New South Wales, which should be able to sustain a couple of paragraphs on the broad characteristics of the district.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge From some Googling it appears that the entire suburb has either been heritage listed ( - but I can't see a listing in the NSW Heritage Register or the local council's heritage register ) or an application to do so has been lodged. However, this can be covered perfectly well in the Ashbury, New South Wales article. Nick-D (talk) 03:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge is appropriate if no one can immediately provide sourcing and develop the article, and keeps the edit history at the redirect, enabling re-creation later if/when sourcing emerges to support a separate article on the historic district. --Doncram (talk) 04:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * KeepTony Rodi (talk) 07:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I am resident of Ashbury, can verify Page is a legitimate description of Ashbury architecture. Article is often referenced by the Ashbury community Group for the purposes of stimulating discussion about importance of our heritage in light of conservation challenges facing the suburb. . 123mattb (talk) 11:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to Ashbury, New South Wales. This article, as written, is a mess. Judiciously selecting materials for merger will clean that up. bd2412  T 19:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.