Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asheesh Misra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  08:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Asheesh Misra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet general notability or biographical notability. Google search turns up no independent sources about him. Article has no references and has missing sections. Promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Google might not be any good for this, as any sources are likely in Hindi. A couple of refs have been added, and the first one seems to be significant coverage (based on google translate), though I am not sure if it is a reliable source, as I do not know the source. The second is a newspaper cutting Pdf, but I cannot translate it so I can't verify the reliability or coverage of that source. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  10:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Insertcleverphrasehere: I am not satisfied with the reliability of the first source and I don't think if we can use it to establish notabiltiy, as per this it looks like a personal web site or something where anyone can post their stories and the second source reads like an advertisement. GSS (talk |c|em ) 12:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you meant to ping . I only provided deletion sorting. North America1000 12:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Opps thank you for pointing it out. GSS (talk |c|em ) 12:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Fails GNG. I can't tell you how much I hate the ISBN in the body of the article: these are commercial bar code numbers used to generate and track book sales, ergo, minus one star for crass promotionalism. Carrite (talk) 15:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:46, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources do not represent 3rd party coverage in reliable sources. This article does not even pass GNG let alone any more specific criteria for writers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.