Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asher's Energy-Mass Relation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:NOTESSAY (also WP:SNOW) j⚛e deckertalk 19:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Asher's Energy-Mass Relation

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Appears to be original search, which isn't allowed here Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:58, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced personal musings. Wikipedia isn't a free webhost.   Acroterion   (talk)   12:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow delete A fifteen year-old's incoherent misunderstanding of Mass–energy equivalence. Unsourced, utterly nonsensical and badly written to boot. We don't publish original research. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 12:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as unveriable original research. — sparklism  hey! 12:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research, unsourced patent nonsense. CodeTheorist (talk) 12:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. I think I fried a few neurons trying to understand that. Turlo Lomon (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Additional comment - Author of page is same name the theory is named after. WP:COI. Turlo Lomon (talk) 12:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Would the closing admin also please delete the page at WikiProject Physics/Asher's Energy-Mass Relation? While it's all fun and games watching him call anyone who disagrees with him a "dog" for deleting his page or refuting his theory, it doesn't belong on the WP:PHYSICS entry.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, not even a fringe theory, just some thoughts. Quailifies as patent nonsense.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Snowball Delete What is this I don't even...? (Also WP:NOTESSAY per above) Sleddog116 (talk) 13:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Answer - From User talk:Syed Ali Asher Kazmi, "As reviewing administrator, I have declined the speedy deletion nomination, because the article is about a theory, not a person". I disagree with this administrator, but now we know why. Turlo Lomon (talk) 14:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Snow delete Wikipedia is not a blog, a webhost, or a publisher of essays and/or original thought (see WP:NOT). C h r o m a Nebula   (talk)   15:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow delete – Zero coverage in reliable sources (based upon cursory source searching). Northamerica1000(talk) 18:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.