Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asher Crispe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  So Why  07:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Asher Crispe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual -- lack of independent sources meeting WP:RS Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Nominator failed to exercise his/her/their due diligence, and a simple cursory search shows multiple third-party sources (most of which are admittedly Jewish but that's perfectly fine given his job as a rabbi) mentioning Crispe -- GNG is more than sufficiently met. Of course the article is in need of some cleanup, but that's not grounds for deletion. Kingoflettuce (talk) 05:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing any reliable sources. Does not appear to meet WP:PROF, or WP:GNG. No claim to notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:BLPNOTE and WP:BASIC. Subject is already linked to two other articles: Shalem Center and Yitzchak Ginsburgh. 238-Gdn (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Article now has 5 independent references. 238-Gdn (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 11:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 11:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Kingoflettuce. I am getting worried that Nomoskedasticity is on a personal vendetta against 238-Gdn who is the creator of this article. Debresser (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The scope and breadth of the sources included in the article meet the notability standard per WP:PEOPLE. Alansohn (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I added another reference from a local paper, but there isn't much out there in terms of significant sourcing. Yoninah (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - most of this looks like self-promotion or promotion by people attached to him. He hasn't actually done something that makes him notable. - Richard Cavell (talk) 20:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  13:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete only claim to notability is an the executive director of the Interinclusion website, a non-notable website. He is a doctoral student. Way WP:TOOSOON. --Bejnar (talk) 02:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, too soon, sources simply don't support the passing of GNG at this time. Bios, mentions and brief local coverage is not the same thing as being permanently notable.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 00:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.