Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish " Foot Soldier of India "


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Star  Mississippi  03:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Ashish " Foot Soldier of India "

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Although He does have sources but "Foot Soldier" is not a Notable category in existence and as mentioned a Social Activist sources doesn't shares spotlight on that aspect, A Consensus would do the justice, Let others decide Suryabeej      ⋠talk⋡    08:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:44, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Education.  Suryabeej      ⋠talk⋡    08:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify. There's quite a bit of coverage even in reliable outlets, although much of it is interviews, ephemeral news coverage, and the like. A delete !vote might be justifiable, but I think draftification would be a better solution: it gives the article's creator (who, judging from the username, likely has a COI) time to shore up notability by citing sources that are independent and secondary (i.e. analysis, not just repeating what Sharma has to say) and also to fix the article's rather promotional tone before submitting it through articles for creation. If the article is kept, it should be moved to a more appropriate title such as Ashish Sharma (activist); the current one is not neutral. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Drafity in full agreement with Extraordinary Writ CT55555 (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.