Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Seth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Ashish Seth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

a promotional article for an astrologer with no plausible reason for notability,

The article seems to be mainly composed of his predictions, but it's hard for me to decipher what was actually claimed, and when  DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Lack of RS. Not quite sure why this came to academic Afd. Did the subject predict if his BLP would be deleted or not? Xxanthippe (talk) 06:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete by all means, nothing at all minimally convincing for any notability and the mass of contents are not helping at all. SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 and G11. Unsourced bragging by non-notable astrologer, who claims lots of famous people emailed him their birth dates, and that lots of stuff he predicted came true. The only "reference" is a link to his profile on an astrology wiki "Astrodatabank", empty apart from a link to a locked Facebook page. Article was created by account Botme7, then mostly edited by older account Bondme7. This seems to be a pattern: Botme7 attempted several times to create Astrodatabank, first under that spelling and then another after the first was salted. Ashish Seth is the only other article that this WP:SPA account has been used for. I've removed the giant unsourced bragging list, and there's virtually nothing left. OnionRing (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment User Ether7 has a user page which consists of a draft of this article, created April 24 . His other helpful contributions include repeatedly removing the speedy tag from this article:, , , creating Astrodatabank, and writing in a style spookily similar to Bondme7: . SPI, ahoy! OnionRing (talk) 08:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy per A7. I already did this once, but the article's been recreated. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Has Significant coverage,verifiability,has third-party source,I have added valid reference to this page Bondme7(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * By far that's simply not enough. SwisterTwister   talk  22:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Basically an A7 case. Note also that the article's creator User:Botme7, and User:Etherseven, mentioned above, have been indef blocked as socks of User:Bondme7, see Sockpuppet investigations/Bondme7. Also, User:Bondme7 has been blocked for a week as well. Nsk92 (talk) 01:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The one claim I can discern in the article, and this takes a lot of discenring, is that Ashish Seth emails notable people to gather information on them, and also reads the paper. Even assuming we could keep this without a source, there is no real claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.