Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashk Dahlén


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 18:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Ashk Dahlén

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:PROF as this scientist is not "notable" enough. Fails also WP:BIO as there does not seem to be any independent coverage. DrPhosphorus (talk) 23:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. There is no evidence of passing WP:PROF in the article, and the subject has an h-score of 3, which is very low, probably partily because GS counts primarily English sources&mdash;but evidence of notability, if it exists, is outside my own ability to detect.   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 23:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.