Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashland, Concordia Parish, Louisiana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Ineligible for SOFT deletion, but there is no one supporting retention or providing any input. Star  Mississippi  17:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Ashland, Concordia Parish, Louisiana

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another "unincorporated community" lie. I cannot tell you what this is from any historical sources at all, except from the same hypsometry that tells us about a nail near to wherever was, in this case from an 1885 USACE survey. We know all about a granite post in a hole in the ground, for Ashland: "[Benchmark 54] is top of granite post buried in the ground on the left of the steps leading to the front entrance of Mr. William G. Walton's residence on Ashland Plantation near Bougere P. O., Louisiana. The top of stone is about 3 inches above ground. Elevation, 23m.5622 It's not in Lippincott's at all, which rules out any sort of town or village or even a post office, although the smart money would be on Bougere being the post office in any case.  The only Ashland that the SPC's 1890 History of Louisiana has, as an incidental mention in brackets, is in Red River Parish across the state.  This one in Concordia is listed in a contemporary directory of Louisiana plantations, and that's it.  This, too, has been lost to history.  Uncle G (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: ineligible for Soft deletion Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 18:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.