Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Maher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) --George Ho (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Ashley Maher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. BangJan1999 19:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Seriously? Virgin Records is not a major label? Who makes up these rules? (If the Wikimedia foundation needs more money to pay for the disk space for the 6 KiB this article consumes, I can add a little to my donation.) Kjetilho (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep The article is indeed weakly sourced, but a search reveals pre-internet age press coverage from multiple sources, as well as multiple releases (2) on a major label. Yes, much of the coverage I could find is superfluous promo-type stuff and interviews, but there is enough to suggest the subject's significance. I advocate keeping and improving sources rather than removing it (although I'm too pressed for time currently to do it myself). ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.