Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Maynard-Brewer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Ashley Maynard-Brewer
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has not played in a fully professional match between two fully professional clubs. Swansea City U21s is not a fully pro team. Simione001 (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - this was only recently nominated for AfD and allowed to be moved to draft to be improved. I suggest some good faith is needed here to allow the article to be improved, rather than multiple nominations. Bookscale (talk) 11:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Its been recreated without improvements so should be Draftify again. Simione001 (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it should not be draftified, because there are always people who wander around draft space and "reactivate" articles that seem ok. (Like this one.) It also doesn't need improvement in itself, we would rather be waiting for the guy's career to take an upturn. Instead it should be userfied. Geschichte (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Some desire for draftifying, but also some objections
 * Either 'delete as non-notable or move to draft as per previous AFD outcome. GiantSnowman 12:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 13:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --BlameRuiner (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm happy for it to be userfied to avoid multiple recreations until the article is ready. Bookscale (talk) 08:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.