Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashok Das


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep.  (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Ashok Das

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Fellow of a society with a large number of members, recipient of non-notable, small awards. Boleyn (talk) 08:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Well known (and highly cited) scholar in his field.TR 21:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The article did not have references. I have added some. A bibliography of major works would be a good idea. He has one book that has been cited over 400 times ( ISBN 9780471599753) and is held in over 1100 libraries . I think the article just needs a bit more work, hopefully from someone in the area of physics. LaMona (talk) 23:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:PROF (well cited publications) and #C3 (Fellow APS). —David Eppstein (talk) 02:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep well-published, author of several textbooks, and clearly notable. h index seems to be around 30+, although I can't get a real precise number with just google scholar. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:59, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn - my error. Thanks for your input, Boleyn (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.