Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashu Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. SK #1 j⚛e deckertalk 02:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Ashu Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The person with very small roles in few movies Fails WP:NACTOR.  C ute st Penguin Hangout 14:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  C ute st Penguin Hangout 14:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  C ute st Penguin Hangout 14:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  C ute st Penguin Hangout 14:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: "Ashu Sharma".


 * Keep. Through available sources it appears to have this actor as meeting WP:GNG and WP:ACTOR.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I am unable to find significant coverage in the link that you have mentioned above. Please help me with direct link. I tried all the search results generated at "Ashu Sharma" but it is only content the result with a name.  C ute st Penguin Hangout 15:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Well... while "significant" does not mean the same as "substantial", it does mean that the topic be spoken of in a more-than-trivial manner to confirm information within Wikipedia, and the topic being spoken of within Wikipedia need not be the sole subject discussed within any confirming source... very cogent here because actors are usually spoken of in context to what they do . Perhaps someone could open a "how to" school to instruct just how patience is used to weed out false positives about same-named persons. For instance, a very brief search finds actor Ashu Sharma's background spoken of here.  His work on the major film Teen Patti is spoken of in more-than-trivial fashion here.  His earlier theater work is spoken of in a more-than-trivial manner here. Someone who does not have Wikipedia notability rarely has their works spoken of in reliable sources. And out of India's billions, this kinda means something. Is he the "most notable ever"... no.  Is he notable enough... yes.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Comment Delete - No indication of importance. &#8212;  C ute st Penguin Hangout 15:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC) Pardon  but YOU nominated this on September 2. There is no need to include an !vote two weeks later. With respects, I have struck your second "delete" vote.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * With respects, your delete is obvious through your bringing this to AFD. You have no need to vote a second time simply to underscore your opinion. And please, no article is going to say "this topic is notable because". Topic notability is found through available sources speaking toward the topic... sources that show editors that WP:BIO, WP:GNG, and WP:ACTOR are met, even if they are not in the article. The "indication of importance" is found through diligent WP:BEFORE and application of policy and guideline... not WP:PPOV. Cheers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * OOps! That I wrote by mistake I am aware of Afd guidelines. thanks! &#8212;  C ute st Penguin Hangout 14:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - As per WP:AfD and reviewing appreciable work by I would like to withdraw the nomination. &#8212;  C ute st Penguin Hangout 14:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.