Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashwin Porwal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Ashwin Porwal
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is recommended for deletion several times in the past. Most of the references are written by single person (aka Umesh Isalkar) questioning reliability of sources used to support notability. References are more advertorial in nature questioning credibility of subjects work. Article needs more credible and reliable references to prevent deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truewiki1 (talk • contribs) 05:12, December 22, 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Discussion page was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log--these issues have been fixed. This article had been tagged multiple times previously by at least three different accounts, but it's only on this latest attempt that they finally created a new discussion page (as "3rd nomination" when in reality it was only the second--also fixed).  That said, I have no opinion of my own at this time on the article itself. --Finngall talk  05:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Maharashtra.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, numerous "sources" are actually just one sources 'Times of India' listed numerous times with different articles, but one sources. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 05:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, problematic patterns. VF (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, if creator and publisher of source are essentially same, there aren't too many reliable sources for this subject since neither independence of sources can be proven, nor conflict of interest or self-publication can be ruled out. Claims made also seem not to be verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiirag (talk • contribs) 07:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.