Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia-1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete arguments are more detailed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Asia-1

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. hueman1 (talk)  10:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David. moreno 72    11:06, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete A sitio is too small to satisfy WP:GEOLAND and be automatically notable, being a subdision of a barangay. Such subdivisions should "be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources". I don't see WP:SIGCOV here. A merge to Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang, the barangay of which it forms part might be merited, but that's a redirect. --Pontificalibus 05:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment, is this a "legally recognised (it is populated) place"? if yes than according to WP:NGEO it is "typically presumed to be notable" and can be kept, if not legally recognised than probably best to redirect to Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:GEOLAND says that places must meet WP:GNG and have "non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" - as the one reference is an unreliable places of interest website (which includes a 7-Eleven in the list), the article does not meet the notability guideline, therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 02:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The single keep !vote here points to WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Asia-1 falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —seav (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.