Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia-2 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Asia-2
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. hueman1 (talk)  10:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David. moreno 72    11:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Again, it has been a topic of debate for years already in Tambayan Philippines. Check Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines/Archive15 as a reference. Usual decision was to redirect and merge with their higher administrative division. Since an article for Canlubang already exists, it could be redirected and merged there. --Hiwilms (talk) 11:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment, Again (see Articles for deletion/Asia-1), is this a "legally recognised (it is populated) place"? if yes than according to WP:NGEO it is "typically presumed to be notable" and can be kept, if not legally recognised than probably best to redirect to Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang (i note this does appear to be a small neighbourhood of 4 paruks). Coolabahapple (talk) 06:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:GEOLAND says that places must meet WP:GNG and have "non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" - of the two references, one is a list of schools and the other the local government website - the article does not meet the notability guideline of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 02:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. -MA Javadi (talk) 11:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. All of the keep !votes here point to WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Asia-2 falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —seav (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.