Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia-Pacific Innovation Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Asia-Pacific Innovation Network

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article hasn't been improved since previous tags put on years ago (Dec 2013 & May 2011). My brief search engine use cannot find much significant coverage - only acknowledgement that there is a conference held. This article is outdated, written as an advertisement ("New members are welcome") and does not meet notability guidelines. ツStacey (talk) 10:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet more spam. Searches do not turn up any significant coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSTflyer (talk • contribs) 13:59, 29 December 2015‎
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  14:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, This article has no citations and references to show the notability of the page (WP:N and WP:REF). Bassically, this article is a simple advertisement (WP:ADV) and a spam (WP:SPAM). ♪ Alberto79 ♪   talk-Contributions 17:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  14:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 07:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Only one source, and it looks like it's the organization's website. Definitely doesn't show notability.  CatcherStorm    talk   07:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.